The Geography of a Sunrise?

By Victor Kuarsingh

I woke up early in San Francisco this week with the blinds open, the sky still dark, cold, and night. Looking out at Coit Tower from my hotel window, I couldn’t help but ask myself — “what is a sunrise to others on a given day?” Waking up early or late certainly has a significant bearing on this, but I also realized that even without traveling, where you live may impact one’s experience. Those of us who have lived in very northern or southern latitudes know there’s a large difference between summer and winter, with a gradual increase and decrease in daylight hours.

I also realized that, outside of this, where one lives impacts when the sun comes up and what the start of a day means. So again — “what is a sunrise to you?” It turns out that’s not a trivial question, and the answer isn’t just about discipline or being a “morning person.” It also has a lot to do with longitude.

Time zones are political. The sun is not. Each zone is a roughly fifteen-degree wedge of the earth, and one clock is asked to govern all of it — sunrise and sunset drift by as much as an hour across that wedge, even though every watch inside it says the same time. In a given time zone, one person can be waking up to a 6 AM sunrise slowly slipping into the day, while someone else wakes up to pitch black, fighting their body’s interpretation that “it’s still night.” By 9 AM, our eastern-biased friend is “ready to go,” and our western-biased friend is “still grappling with their start.”

Chronobiologists have a name for what happens next: social jetlag. It’s usually used to describe the gap between when your body wants to sleep and when your calendar makes you — most familiarly, the whiplash between a Friday-night bedtime and a Monday alarm. But a 2019 study in the Journal of Health Economics (Giuntella & Mazzonna) found the same mismatch happening geographically, quietly, every single day, to people who never cross a time zone at all. They just live on the wrong side of one.

The mechanism is almost absurdly simple. An extra hour of evening light delays the body’s release of melatonin. Bedtime drifts later while one’s alarm clock remains steadfast. Across US time-zone borders, that’s worth about 19 minutes of sleep a night, on average — not dramatic on any one night, but compounding, year after year, into measurably higher rates of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, and into a subtle but real drag on regional income.

I have spent a lot of time between Toronto and Miami, both several degrees of longitude into the “late” side of Eastern time — later sunrise and sunset on the clock than cities like Montreal or New York, though neither is the most extreme case. That distinction goes to Detroit, which is geographically so far west it sits past the traditional Eastern time boundary, yet still runs on Eastern clocks. Its residents get the latest sunsets, and the latest, most reluctant sunrises, of any major Eastern city. But Miami and Toronto are both, in this particular sense, on the same side of the ledger as Detroit — cities where the sun shows up on the clock a little later than it “should,” and where 9 AM asks something of the body that the sky hasn’t quite delivered yet.

None of this is really about sunrise trivia. It’s about the fact that “a standard workday” is a fiction we apply uniformly to a population that does not experience the day uniformly. The same start time that feels natural in one city is a small, silent tax on another — paid in sleep, in health, and apparently in income. We’ve spent a lot of energy optimizing how people work. We’ve spent almost none asking where they’re doing it from, and what the sky outside their window actually looks like at 7 AM.

So: what time do the people you work with actually wake up? And when they do — do they see the sun?

The Internet Society – Helping Democratize the Internet

By Victor Kuarsingh

I recall way back in the mid-90s, this new phenomenon called the “Internet”. Working in a Computer Store while in school, it was the perfect place to watch the fledgling Internet landscape grow from a consumer’s perspective.  Sure I had my model years priory surfing BBS sites – but this was different.  

Strolling the aisles in the store, I saw this interesting display of software packages frontingInternet access providers like Delphi and Microsoft Network as well as early browsers such as Mosaic and Netscape Navigator., 

Dial-up was the primary method of access. With the right modem, speeds progressed from 14.4 Kbps to 28.8 Kbps and 33.6 Kbps, eventually reaching 56 Kbps—after a brief protocol war between U.S. Robotics’ x2 and Lucent/Rockwell’s K56flex was settled by the universal V.90 standard.

If you were a business or had money to burn, ISDN was an option, unleashing 64 Kbps or dual-channel 128 Kbps. For large enterprises with real budgets, T1 lines providing a blazing 1.544 Mbps were the gold standard. As we moved past the 1990s into the 2000s, consumer speeds exploded with the arrival of telecom Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) offerings and cable internet, which matured into high-speed DOCSIS standards by the mid-2000s.

Moving through the 2000s and 2010s, we have seen continuous innovation in internet infrastructure to support an explosion of online services, digital experiences, and remote work built on this flourishing fabric. Today, it’s hard to imagine a world where we can’t work from home, attend classes, check social media with the tap of a screen, order food, book trips, video call loved ones, or stream our favorite shows.

Now, here is the kicker: this was and is my experience living in North America, a reality far removed from what many in the world experience today.

However, while many of us enjoy this as our daily normal, a massive portion of the global population does not. What we take for granted as ‘the Internet’ is often unreliable, severely restricted, or entirely unavailable elsewhere. Millions of eager, talented young people are limited in their educational pursuits, isolated from global news, and cut off from the rest of the world—not by choice, but by a lack of basic infrastructure.

This is why organizations like the Internet Society (ISOC) and the Internet Society Foundation are so crucial. For years, these non-profits have worked tirelessly to close the digital divide. Through hands-on programs that expand infrastructure, foster local tech communities, and champion open access, these heroes work to truly democratize the internet for everyone.

Seeing the face of a young student connecting to world-class educational resources for the first time, or a family reuniting across continents, or a remote village accessing lifesaving telemedicine warms the heart. This is the vital work that the Internet Society and Internet Society Foundation continue to drive forward. Powered by dedicated staff, passionate global chapters, and countless volunteers, they are changing lives every single day.

I normally don’t ask others to Donate, but for those who find it in their heart to support this critical work, the Internet Society would most definitely appreciate the opportunity to pay that forward.  Just look at the Impact Stories.